Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Allie Kiick vs Berfu Cengiz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kiick vs Cengiz analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Allie Kiick vs Berfu Cengiz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kiick 0 - 0 Cengiz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kiick has won 45.15% of points on their second serve, while Cengiz has won 46.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kiick, in recent form, has won 56.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cengiz has won 61.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.43% and 41.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kiick has saved 52.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cengiz has saved 50.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kiick has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 28/ 14), with Cengiz winning 57.14% (W/L 36/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kiick has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 144/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 108/ 58), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61).
- Player level: In the last year, Kiick has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 28/ 14), where as Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 33/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kiick has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.76 while Cengiz has played against players with an average rank of 286.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kiick has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cengiz has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kiick has converted 57.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cengiz has converted 48.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
303
Rank
126
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
252
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
59% (277-192)
Career Total W/L
59% (240-169)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
69% (29-13)
$189,745
Career Prize Money
$5,844
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Allie Kiick vs Berfu Cengiz For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kiick VS Cengiz
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Allie Kiick | Berfu Cengiz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 69% (29/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (26/16) | 64% (65/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (193/149) | 55% (515/421) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 76% (26/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:33 | 1:39:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 170.35 | 304.02 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (674/1066) | 67% (1968/2959) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (430/674) | 60% (1184/1968) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (177/392) | 47% (461/991) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (81/141) | 49% (214/437) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (522/1079) | 49% (1546/3174) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (12/8) | 68% (26/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 69% (29/42) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 59% (10/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 81% (27/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 19% (27/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 47% (15/7) |
Allie Kiick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Tereza Valentova
Player
Allie Kiick
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Amandine Hesse
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Allie Kiick
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Catherine Harrison
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Victoria Hu
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Jaeda Daniel
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Allie Kiick
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
14
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Allie Kiick
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Angella Okutoyi
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Victoria Gomez
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Berfu Cengiz
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
52 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Marie Benoit
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Tatiana Pieri
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Ylena In-Albon
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Berfu Cengiz
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
4
Aces
2
17
Double Faults
8
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
60 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
59 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Weronika Falkowska
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Susan Bandecchi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
21%
(
6 of
29)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kiick Vs Cengiz Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kiick are available here and Cengiz photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Allie Kiick
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Berfu Cengiz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
